Tuesday, 21 February 2012

Visions of Endearment-The Fan made Movie Poster

What an age we live in!
As a visual medium, I have always found it inspiring that the magic of a cult film phenomenon is so potent that the fans themselves can create their own works of art set in the universe of their favourite movies. This has been going on since people first started brain-salivating over great flicks. However, the digital age empowers the memes and the musers to communicate on a global scale.
Though none of this great work is my own, here are my top 5 cult movie phenomenon's as told through their fan's own poster designs...


5.  Fight Club (1999)





































I love the grim, morbid tone of these. Also, the ones with captions echo notions of what we have come to see as political propaganda.
My verdict-4/5











4. 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)















Yes, yes, I know this is from the sequel!!

There is a visual splendor to these. They are rich and panoramic like the film itself.
My Verdict-4/5


3. A Clockwork Orange (1971)


                                                                   






















           

                                                                             























These fans are no joke! Incorporating some of the ideological themes behind the film (sexuality, mind control, psychosis) into graphic interpretation. Vivid!
My verdict-5/5



2. The Big Lebowski (1998)


lollollollol




























































Nobody does unashamedly silly like those that inhabit the Lebowski-verse.
My verdict 5/5.


And the winner is......


1. Drive (2011)





































There are literally hundreds more!!
Nicholas Winding Refn once said that he makes films that are voyeuristic-they see and like to be seen. It seems that the moments of quiet revelation in Drive have caused a minor graphic phenomenon amongst fans the world over during the last number of months since the film's triumphant release last year. Perhaps they want to visually express the many words that go unspoken in the film?? Man...that's deep!
My verdict-a definite 5/5.


See also: those that just missed out on the list-Scott Pilgrim, The Limey, Deliverance, Nosferatu, Taxi Driver, The Good,The Bad, and The Ugly, Citizen Kane, The Graduate.

Thanks for viewing/reading. Keep fandom alive!!


Wednesday, 15 February 2012

Chronicle-Kino Shout! Review


Chronicle (2012)

Dir: Josh Trank

Starring: Dane DeHaan,  Alex Russell, Michael B. Jordan.

Verdict: 4/5

Great films that are similar: Superman, The Blair Witch Project, Kick Ass.


...............................................


There are a myriad of cliches with which I could open up this review. I could say "wow, turns out that you can teach an old dog new tricks!" I could also say "its a great thing to realise that life can still surprise you." However, since Chronicle is anything but a tired cliche, why don't I open by simply quoting the great philosopher Martin Lawrence-"Shit just got real."


"Damn, I loved Bad Boys 2"-Heidigger



When I first heard word of this one I was wary. The film is a hybrid of the superhero and found footage  (The Blair Witch project, Cloverfield) genres. As such, it toys with and attempts to function within two of the most over-used and tired of modern genres (the rom-com not withstanding, of course). I am not a sci-fi geek, nor am I the most avid superhero devotee. For me these are simply two genres that, like many others, produce both their fair share of hits and misses alike. Thus, my first praise for this visually clever and emotionally resonant film is that it succeeds on virtually every level. Not only this, but you may even find that it treads new ground for both genres that it represents.

Firstly, we have the principals. Newcomers Dane DeHaan,  Alex Russell, and Michael B. Jordan (yup, the black jock kid is played by a guy called Micheal Jordan) play their parts with such such crude, self-effacing teenage realism that those in their teens will identify and those not, will remember with chagrin.  Of course, this in itself is far from original. But, how about this for radical question: how come those who inherit super powers are always so noble?!



Students-noble...

...and compliant.


Seriously, why are these superheroes always such selfless people?! They inherit super-human abilities and the first thing they think of is to fight crime?! Why don't they get drunk on their own power first, play some pranks, commit some petty crime and such? That's what  I would do! Well, I'm proud to say that this movie is one of the precious few in which the "superheroes" do just that. During the course of the first half of this film we see our "heroes" use their new found telekinetic powers to terrify children, steal cars, and steal a glimpse up girls skirts.

 And it's charming!  We see three friends celebrate youth together, forming a bond not unlike old-fashioned childhood tall tales like Stand by Me or early work of Steven Spielberg. When Matt tells the others that "I think this was the best day of my life", I felt a distinct and poignant "aint life grand" lump form in my throat, and for all of the right reasons. Thus, the film does succeed in selling these teenagers and their values well.

Classy.

Then, in stark contrast to this, we have the darker elements of the film. Yes, the darkness is indeed strong with this one. It is a stock found footage cliche that one of the principle characters always has to inexplicably take it upon themselves to film absolutely everything that transpires out of some "principle"; this film is no different. What is unique, however, is that the character in question takes to the camera in order to capture his drunken, abusive father on camera...

....oh, and also, to capture the final days of his dying mother!!


Cheery.





And so begins one of the bleakest and mostly boldly dark superhero outings of all time. Even Christopher Nolan would blush as the disturbed young protagonist Andrew allows his new found power to transform him from coy, misunderstood kid to a Darwinian-inspired murderer. Going above and beyond the call of duty in following his theory that he is a Nietzschean Ubermensche, the  kid steals, murders, and generally wreaks the sort of havoc generally reserved for screen dictators. Leading to the kind of place that all darker-than-necessary film outings should-with a bloody showdown.

Yes, the film's modus operandi encompasses many of the most potentially repulsive superhero/found-footage cliches.  The humble origin story and the nobility vs evil issue has been done to death within hero ranks. Furthermore, if you are like me, you will be getting tired of the contrived notion that the camera is always in the right place in supposedly "found-footage" pieces...

...but, hey, look at what the film does have. The films jovial, prank-filled early scenes give this film a wonderfully natural sense of character investment by the time things start to get chaotic for our young "heroes". Furthermore, the intelligence of the way this film is shot is sufficient to change the way we think about found-footage movies forever. The genre was previously very static visually. This was a necessity, because even the slightest of angle changes would betray the found-footage premise. However, this film uses a significant amount of imagination. Having heroes that can telekinetically lift a camera allows for the director to utilise crane shots (ooh!). Furthermore, this is the surveillance age, cameras are everywhere! If one can access the footage from, say, a hospital surveillance camera, and then splice it with footage from the protagonists camera-voila! We have the opportunity for Hollywood editing of a fight sequence (ahh!)!

Thus, privacy violation is a good thing...


Thanks, Hollywood!
So, as it was in the beginning of the found-footage revolution, so it is again. For, as was the case with The Blair Witch Project, what we have here is nothing new in story, but it does advance the way we may think about our storytelling just a little bit. So, if you're interested in a truly good yarn this month, then get ye to the movies, friends!


By the time you read this, two of these children may be dead!


Friday, 10 February 2012

Man on a Ledge-Kino Shout! Review

Man on a Ledge (2012)

Dir: Asger Leth

Starring: Sam Worthington, Elizabeth Banks, Jamie Bell, Ed Harris.

Verdict: 2/5

Great films that are similar: Dog Day Afternoon, Thief, Heat.


....................................


Here is a question that we have all asked at some point: would we free-fall one hundred feet off of a building just to punch Ed Harris in the face?

After Enemy at the Gates? Yup.
Actually, to be honest, Ed harris is hardly to blame for this shallow, cliched hodge-podge.  In fact, Ed is just one of the many decent actors that struggle admirably against a film suffering grievously with a preposterous plot, archetypical characters,  and an ending so contrived it gives the Cold War a run for its money.

So, here is a list of things that we must put up with in order for the thriller elements of this movie to work:

1. A cop is set up for stealing a diamond that he has never been known to possess.
2. A man can fake a death and a fist fight with his brother in order to escape custody.
3. A man can jump from one building to the next like freakin' Spiderman.
4. All businessmen are evil.
5. All women are stupid.
6. So are men.
7. Businessmen are evil enough to build skyscrapers just to protect their precious diamonds.
8. Women dress like they are going to an orgy when they rob diamonds.
9. Lady cops will fall in love with men who are clearly guilty of grand larsony.

Get the idea?

"Our audience need to be THIS stupid!"


Don't get me wrong, it's not that this film doesn't work in parts. The plot marginally keeps afloat. The film centers on a disgraced cop who climbs onto the window ledge several stories up in a New York hotel building. What at first looks like an obvious suicide attempt unravels into a greater mystery. With such a stock thriller premise, director Leth (whose only previous outing was indie pic Ghost of City Soliel) needed to be able to shoot and block tense action sequences, and he does do with great gusto.

The film is all about power; about the shamed and forgotten little guy versus the corrupt corporate elite. Thus, despite claims to the contrary, I believe that action-star Sam Worthington was apt for this part. He portrays the role with action credentials, but also with the certain frailty of an average guy dealing with things that far exceed his capacity. Furthermore, up until her character's ridiculous conclusion, Elizabeth banks is surprisingly effective as the tough lady cop with a heart of gold. When she too steps out onto the ledge towards the end, we feel for them both. There is even charmingly human banter during the heist scenes between Jamie Bell's young hot-shot thief and his stunning love interest Genesis Rodriguez.

Jamie Bell-more man then you??
So, if the film has moments of tension and the human factor, then why do I think that it stinks? Well, basically, at it's best it is cliche, and at its worst it is ridiculous. Firstly, the fact that Elizabeth Banks's cop character can't spot the set-up is ludicrous. When a strangely calm, non-distressed man is standing on a ledge cracking jokes and looking pretty, it generally means that he is stalling. Take that and add in the fact that he is clearly communicating with his jewel-thief brother through an ear-piece and, at one point, actually attempts to cover up one of his brother's minor explosions by rallying the crowd into a fever pitch of cheering (seriously!).

Then there is Ed Harris's character, a real estate broker that survived the market crash by utilising the corruption of good old capitalism and, essentially, stomping all over the Johnny-Proletariat. He racially insults the mexican character and constantly threatens basically everyone in sight (with or against him) with murder. If there is a sequel, he will need a little pantomine mustache just to up the evil-ante another little bit...


....because, in film, it's all about subtlety.


Thus, this is a reasonably innocuous failure. Even if the heroes succeed, do we care in so stock an outing? It is cinematic celery, the cinematic Nissan Almera. It is a movie for that friend of yours who is content for a silly, cathartic affair. For the person who wishes for their films to simply work, and no more. It would be reasonably innocent if it's absurd storytelling didn't occasionally numb the brain.

So, either avoid Man on a Ledge, or just don't use your brain so much....


...some things are better enjoyed without it.

Friday, 3 February 2012

Buried Treasure: The Most Criminally Underrated Movies-Part 1

What are the most underrated, under-viewed, unappreciated films of all time?


PART 1

Point Blank (1967)                                    

Dir: John Boorman

Starring: Lee Marvin, Angie Dickinson.



                                                                                   Synopsis:

Question: What film launched John Boorman as a director, gave Lee Marvin his most diverse role, and spawned an era of Unknown/Taken-esque  testosterone thrillers?

Look no further....
                                                               
A stylistic homage from American genre cinema to the European avant-garde? An "F-you" to mainstream cinematic structure? All of the above. Lee Marvin boasts the testosterone of a man in constant frenzy, forsaking dough, dames, and danger in the name of revenge in this stellar classic!

Betrayed by his best friend and the woman he loves, Walker is out for clarity, redemption, and ultimate revenge. Typical premise, sure, but it's the arty sensibility of this film that represents the seismic shift from its source novel.. Shot in the blazing LA sun, it is simply one of the most beautiful films ever made. It paved the way for the style-obsessed 1970s violence-orgies like Coffy and Rolling Thunder. Thus, the film is a key text in understanding where the likes of Pulp Fiction spawned from. Seriously, it all connects....Ask Quentin Tarantino or Steven Soderberg (the latter of the two is so enamoured that he recorded guest commentary for the dvd) how important this one is!

There are no answers in this mystery, only more questions. The disappearance of Walker is as shocking as the disappearance of the film from the popular consciousness.








..................................................

Hardcore (1979)

Dir: Paul Schrader

Starring: George C. Scott










"Oh my God! That's my daughter!"-Would these be your words if you had just seen your daughter star in a sleazy adult film?

This is one of the 1970s (ahem) dirtier diamonds. Tough on the outside, but passionate at the core, this movie is shockingly likable and genuinely earnest in its sentiments about family, loneliness and the vast changes within the American landscape.




You may recognise writer/director Paul Schrader (he is adapting his screenplay from his brother Leonard's novel) as the writer of Taxi Driver. Turning his attention once more to the corruption of the average American Joe The Plumber-type, this film details the plight of a conservative Mid-Western father who's daughter goes missing. Don't worry, the daughter is found...in the shape of a drug-soaked porn star.

With the help of a virtuous call girl, the family man ventures through liberal LA's moral abyss to turn the "innocence corrupted" film ideal on its head.
Scott Weinberg called Hardcore a "stress-headache of a movie...that you can't turn off."



.......................................

The Woodsman (2004)

Dir:  Nicole Kassell

Starring: Kevin Bacon, Kyra Segwick, Eve, Mos Def.





Synopsis:

Speaking of "innocence corrupted", how is this for a headline-"Rapper Mos Def steals the show in a film about a paedophile."

Yes, the most controversial entry to this list is The Woodsman, the 2004 indie shocker from debutant director Nicole Kassell (who went on to make terrible chick flick A Little Bit of Heaven!!!) that saw Kevin Bacon play Walter, a man trying to reform his life after a 12 year prison sentence for child molestation.

The film's main question regards mercy. Is Walter an evil man or simply a sick one? Seen as a monster by his employer and a scene-stealing police officer played by Mos Def, Walter can initially only confide in his therapist (played by indie legend Michael Shannon).

Though Walter seems benevolent and finds tenderness in the arms of a trouble female co-worker, one can't escape the dreadful sense that, as Walter himself admits, the statistics are in favour of him falling into old ways.

Sensationally shot and composed, this film finds horror in the smallest of moments.

You will rarely sit through scenes so affecting.






That guy used to rap?!

.................................................








Thanks for reading!
STAY WITH ME FOR FUTURE UNDERRATED GEMS!!!!!